A New York appeals court has upheld a $3.3 million verdict against Ford Motor Company in an asbestos lawsuit brought by a former dealership parts department worker diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma decades after his exposure to Ford’s brake products.
Background
Joseph Skrzynski worked in the parts department of a Ford dealership from 1975 to 1980, where he regularly handled brake components manufactured by Ford. In 2021, he was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer of the abdominal lining linked to asbestos exposure.
Court records show that Ford’s brake components contained between 25% and 50% chrysotile asbestos. Testing by an environmental scientist established that handling those brakes released toxic dust into the air, creating an inhalation hazard for workers like Skrzynski.
Jury Findings
The jury determined that Ford’s brake products were a “significant contributing factor” in Skrzynski’s peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosis. Jurors also found that Ford was negligent in failing to warn dealership workers about the risks of asbestos in its brake components, and returned a verdict of $3.3 million in damages.
Peritoneal mesothelioma affects the lining of the abdomen. It is distinct from pleural mesothelioma, which affects the lining of the lungs, though both forms are associated with asbestos exposure.
Appeal Rejected
Ford challenged the verdict on appeal, but the appellate court rejected the company’s arguments and affirmed the jury’s findings. The ruling leaves the $3.3 million award intact.
The case adds to a long history of asbestos litigation against Ford and other automakers whose brake, clutch, and gasket products contained asbestos through much of the twentieth century. Parts department employees and mechanics who handled those components regularly were among those with documented exposure.
What is peritoneal mesothelioma?▼
Peritoneal mesothelioma is a cancer of the peritoneum, the thin tissue lining the abdomen. It is caused by asbestos fibers that are ingested or inhaled and migrate to the abdominal cavity. It is rarer than pleural mesothelioma but shares the same connection to asbestos exposure.
What type of asbestos was in Ford's brake components?▼
Court records in this case show that Ford’s brake products contained chrysotile asbestos, also known as white asbestos, at concentrations ranging from 25% to 50%.
How long after exposure was the plaintiff diagnosed?▼
Joseph Skrzynski worked at a Ford dealership parts department from 1975 to 1980. His mesothelioma diagnosis came in 2021, reflecting the disease’s characteristic latency period of several decades.
What did the appeals court decide?▼
The New York appeals court upheld the jury’s $3.3 million verdict, rejecting Ford’s arguments for reversal and affirming the findings that Ford was negligent and that its brake products were a significant contributing factor to the plaintiff’s illness.
References
Automotive News. (2025-08-22). Asbestos verdict against Ford upheld by appeals court.
https://www.autonews.com/retail/service-and-parts/an-parts-worker-asbestos-court-ruling-0822/
Asbestos & Mesothelioma Law Blog. (2025-09-29). Appeals Court Upholds $3.3 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Against Ford Motor Company.
https://www.mesolawcenter.com/blog/appeals-court-upholds-3-3-million-mesothelioma-verdict-against-ford-motor-company/