Louisiana Mesothelioma Verdicts and Settlements: Avondale, Take-Home, and the Virile Share
Verified Louisiana verdicts include the $36.7M Walker chemical corridor case (affirmed at $35.75M), Pete v. Ports America (reduced to $5M), and $7M Williams.
Louisiana’s industrial profile, anchored by Avondale Shipyard, the Mississippi River refinery and petrochemical corridor, and longshore work at the Port of New Orleans, produces asbestos cases that routinely involve many defendants and many product manufacturers. Three verdicts in particular illustrate how Louisiana juries have handled chemical corridor, take-home, and longshore exposure.
Notable Louisiana Outcomes
| Amount | Case and Jurisdiction | Exposure Type |
|---|---|---|
| $36.7M jury verdict (June 2022); affirmed $35.75M | Walker v. Level 3 Holdings et al. (Orleans Parish CDC) | Chemical corridor plants, 1960s-1970s |
| $10,351,020.70 verdict (Nov. 2020); reduced to $5M | Henry Pete v. Ports America Gulfport (Orleans Parish CDC, Div. N-8, docket 2019-10545) | Take-home from longshore work clothes, 1964-1968 |
| $7M verdict (April 2016); affirmed | Williams v. Ingersoll-Rand (Natchitoches Parish 10th JDC, No. 76,787) | Take-home from Placid Oil worker clothes |
Walker v. Level 3 Holdings: $36.7M Chemical Corridor Verdict, Affirmed at $35.75M
In June 2022, after a six-day trial in Orleans Parish Civil District Court, a Louisiana jury entered a $36.7 million verdict in favor of Bernard Walker, a retired Local 60 union welder and pipefitter. Defendants included Level 3 Holdings (formerly Peter Kiewit Sons’) and Taylor-Seidenbach Inc., among 21 named defendants in total. Walker was exposed at multiple plants along the Louisiana chemical corridor in the 1960s and 1970s.
The jury allocated 11 of 21 virile shares to Level 3 Holdings, producing a Level 3 liability of $19,254,279.23 against the company. The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal subsequently affirmed the judgment against Level 3 at $35.75 million, leaving the verdict and underlying liability findings intact.
Baron & Budd reported the verdict as the firm’s largest single-client asbestos judgment in Louisiana at the time of announcement.
Henry Pete v. Ports America Gulfport: Take-Home From Longshore Work
On November 4, 2020, an Orleans Parish Civil District Court jury (Division N-8, docket 2019-10545) awarded Henry Pete $10,351,020.70 against Ports America Gulfport, Inc. (successor to Boland Marine). Pete developed mesothelioma from take-home exposure to his father’s longshore work clothes between 1964 and 1968. The award broke down to $551,020.70 past medical expenses, $4.3 million past and future pain and suffering, $3 million physical disability, and $2.5 million loss of enjoyment of life.
The Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the verdict on January 5, 2023 (docket 2021-CA-0626). The Louisiana Supreme Court (docket 2023-C-00170, October 2023) reduced general damages to $5 million as the “highest amount that could be reasonably awarded,” establishing what Louisiana attorneys now refer to as the “Pete Standard” for appellate review of general damages in mesothelioma cases. The liability finding and the underlying take-home exposure theory were not disturbed.
Myra Williams v. Ingersoll-Rand: Laundering a Husband’s Clothes
On April 29, 2016, the 10th Judicial District Court in Natchitoches Parish (Judge Lala B. Sylvester, Case No. 76,787) awarded Myra Williams’s family $7 million for her take-home mesothelioma death. Williams developed mesothelioma from laundering her husband Jimmy Williams’s asbestos-dusted Placid Oil work clothes and died from the disease.
Ingersoll-Rand was found 100% liable on the wrongful death claim and 50% on the survival action. The breakdown: $3 million survival action, $1 million wrongful death to Jimmy Williams, and $750,000 to each of four children. Counsel included Baggett McCall LLC (Wells T. Watson, Jeffrey T. Gaughan), Unglesby Law Firm (Lewis O. Unglesby, Lance C. Unglesby), and Kelly & Townsend (Donald G. Kelly, William L. Townsend III). The Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the verdict, leaving the liability and causation findings intact.
Federal Rulings That Shape Louisiana Cases
Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., 70 F.4th 315 (5th Cir. 2023)
The Fifth Circuit held that the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act does not preempt Louisiana state-law tort claims for asbestos exposure that occurred in a “twilight zone” predating both the LHWCA’s 1972 amendments and Louisiana workers’ compensation coverage for mesothelioma (1975). Lynn Barrosse worked as an electrician at Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) from 1969 to 1977 and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2020. Rehearing was denied July 10, 2023, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on January 8, 2024 (No. 23-368, petition filed October 5, 2023), leaving the Fifth Circuit ruling intact and remanding to the Eastern District of Louisiana (Case No. 2:20-cv-02042-WBV-JVM) for further proceedings.
The decision preserved Louisiana state-court remedies for a narrow but important class of pre-1972 Avondale workers.
Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (E.D. La. 2023)
In Robichaux (Case No. 2:22-cv-00610, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana), Judge Darrel James Papillion denied summary judgment motions by Avondale, Uniroyal, and Foster Wheeler. Felton Robichaux worked as an insulator and carpenter at Avondale from 1961 to 1979 and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in January 2022. His claim also included take-home exposure from a family member. The court found genuine issues of material fact on substantial-factor exposure and applied Barrosse to reject the preemption defense.
Cole v. Celotex Corp., 599 So.2d 1058 (La. 1992)
Cole is the foundation of Louisiana’s pre-1980 asbestos framework. The Louisiana Supreme Court held that asbestos exposures predating August 1, 1980 are governed by the pre-comparative-fault virile share (solidary liability) regime, and that injury accrues at significant exposure for purposes of the applicable liability framework. Because pre-1980 exposures are governed by solidary liability, a Louisiana plaintiff can recover full damages from any solvent joint tortfeasor. That is why cases tracing back to Avondale’s WWII through 1970s operations, or to refinery and petrochemical work before August 1980, can have very different settlement dynamics than later exposures.
For exposures before August 1, 1980, Louisiana applies the virile share doctrine. Multiple defendants are jointly and severally liable, meaning a plaintiff can collect a full judgment from any solvent defendant. Post-August-1-1980 exposures fall under comparative fault instead. This distinction is central to how Louisiana cases are valued and settled.
Filing Deadlines in Louisiana
Act 423 (HB 315), signed in 2024 and effective July 1, 2024, repealed La. Civ. Code Arts. 3492 and 3493 in their entirety and set a two-year general prescriptive period for delictual actions. Art. 3492 had been the general one-year personal-injury delictual article, and Art. 3493 governed damage to immovable property, so the older idea that asbestos claims stay at one year through Art. 3493 no longer holds. Asbestos personal-injury claims fall under the new two-year general period, which runs from the day the injury or damage is sustained.
The two-year period applies prospectively to delictual actions arising after July 1, 2024. Claims that arose before that date remain governed by the prior one-year period, so the date a claim accrued controls which deadline applies.
| State | Personal Injury | Wrongful Death |
|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | 2 years from injury (Act 423, eff. 7/1/2024) | 2 years from death |
| Texas | 2 years from diagnosis | 2 years from death |
| Tennessee | 1 year from diagnosis | 1 year from death |
| Pennsylvania | 2 years from diagnosis | 2 years from death |
| New York | 3 years from diagnosis | 2 years from death |
Gulf Coast cases often span state lines. Texas verdicts and settlements and Texas Gulf Coast statistics cover a parallel set of refineries, chemical plants, and shipyards, with many of the same asbestos product manufacturers named as defendants.
How Louisiana Cases Compensate
Most Louisiana mesothelioma cases resolve through a combination of state-court lawsuits and asbestos bankruptcy trust fund claims. Trust claims are administrative and independent of lawsuits. Louisiana’s virile share framework for pre-1980 exposures shapes how lawsuit recoveries are allocated among defendants, but it does not change trust eligibility.
These verdicts represent reported outcomes in specific cases. Individual case results depend on exposure history, medical documentation, defendants identified, and facts specific to each matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Louisiana now applies a two-year prescriptive period under Act 423 for claims arising after July 1, 2024, and the appellate history of Pete v. Ports America shows that awards can be modified after trial.
References
Deutsch Kerrigan. Fourth Circuit Affirms $35.75M Orleans Parish Mesothelioma Verdict.
https://www.deutschkerrigan.com/insights/fourth-circuit-affirms-orleans-parish-35-75-million-dollar-jury-award-to-mesothelioma-plaintiff
Mealey's / LexisNexis. Louisiana Jury Returns $36.7 Million Verdict in Mesothelioma Case.
https://www.mealeys.com/mealeys/articles/1669693/louisiana-jury-returns-36-7-million-verdict-in-mesothelioma-case
Baron & Budd. Baron & Budd: Largest Asbestos-Related Judgment in Louisiana.
https://baronandbudd.com/news/baron-budd-largest-asbestos-related-judgment-louisiana/
Baggett McCall LLC. $7M Verdict for Family in Take-Home Asbestos Exposure Case.
https://baggettmccall.com/7m-verdict-family-take-home-asbestos-exposure-case/
Biz New Orleans. Unglesby and Baggett McCall Win $7M Take-Home Asbestos Verdict.
https://bizneworleans.com/unglesby-baggett-mccall-win-7m-award-for-mesothelioma-victims-family-in-la-take-home-asbestos-exposure-case/
Product Law Perspective. Louisiana Appellate Court Affirms $10.35M Take-Home Verdict.
https://www.productlawperspective.com/2023/03/louisiana-appellate-court-affirms-10-35m-verdict-based-on-take-home-asbestos-exposure/
Baron Budd Louisiana. Louisiana Supreme Court Reduces $10M Mesothelioma Award to $5M.
https://www.bblawla.com/our-news-and-events/louisiana-supreme-court-reduces-10-million-award-in-mesothelioma-case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit / Justia. Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., 70 F.4th 315 (5th Cir. 2023).
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/21-30761/21-30761-2023-06-12.html
Louisiana Supreme Court / Justia. Cole v. Celotex Corp., 599 So.2d 1058 (La. 1992).
https://law.justia.com/cases/louisiana/supreme-court/1992/91-c-2531-2.html
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana. Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls (E.D. La. 2023) Opinion.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-laed-2_22-cv-00610/pdf/USCOURTS-laed-2_22-cv-00610-10.pdf
Reader Q&A
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the largest reported Louisiana mesothelioma verdict?
Counsel reported the June 2022 $36.7 million Orleans Parish verdict in Walker v. Level 3 Holdings as the largest single-client asbestos judgment Baron & Budd had obtained in Louisiana at the time of announcement. The Louisiana Fourth Circuit affirmed the judgment at $35.75 million. Larger unreported or consolidated outcomes may exist.
What is the statute of limitations for mesothelioma in Louisiana?
Two years for claims arising after July 1, 2024. Act 423 (HB 315), effective that date, repealed La. Civ. Code Arts. 3492 and 3493 and set a two-year general prescriptive period for delictual actions, running from the day the injury is sustained. Art. 3492 had been the one-year general personal-injury article and Art. 3493 governed immovable property, so there is no asbestos one-year carve-out. The two-year period applies prospectively, so claims that arose before July 1, 2024 remain under the prior one-year period.
Can Avondale workers still bring Louisiana state-court claims?
Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls, 70 F.4th 315 (5th Cir. 2023), preserved Louisiana state tort claims for certain pre-1972 Avondale exposures, holding that LHWCA does not preempt them. The U.S. Supreme Court denied cert on January 8, 2024. Robichaux (E.D. La. 2023) applied that framework to a 1961 to 1979 Avondale insulator. The specific facts of each worker’s dates of exposure and employment matter.
Do take-home exposure cases have a track record in Louisiana?
Yes. Williams v. Ingersoll-Rand (Natchitoches, April 2016) and Pete v. Ports America Gulfport (Orleans, November 2020) are both take-home exposure cases, tied to spouse laundering and longshoreman’s son exposure respectively. The Williams verdict was affirmed by the Third Circuit. The Pete award was affirmed by the Fourth Circuit and later reduced on general damages to $5 million by the Louisiana Supreme Court.
What is the average payout for a mesothelioma settlement?
Average mesothelioma settlements range from $1 million to $1.4 million for people with mesothelioma filing personal injury or wrongful death claims. Trial verdicts average higher, from $2.4 million to $20.7 million, though fewer than 5% of cases reach trial. Asbestos trust fund payouts average $300,000 to $400,000. Actual amounts vary by case factors like exposure history and defendant liability. These figures come from law firm reports on 2026 cases.
Are mesothelioma settlements public record?
Most mesothelioma settlements are private due to confidentiality clauses in agreements, keeping payout details out of public record. Trial verdicts, in contrast, become part of public court records and may appear in legal publications or news reports. This distinction allows companies to avoid public acknowledgment of liability through settlements.
What are the verdicts for mesothelioma?
Mesothelioma verdicts vary widely depending on case circumstances, but trial awards average $20.7 million according to Mealey’s Litigation Report (2024), significantly higher than settlements which typically range from $1 million to $2 million. Recent high-profile verdicts include a $1.5 billion award by a Maryland jury against Johnson & Johnson in 2026 for talc-based baby powder exposure causing peritoneal mesothelioma, and a $51 million verdict upheld in February 2026 against Avon for mesothelioma caused by talc products. Juries may award both compensatory damages (for medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering) and punitive damages intended to punish corporate negligence and deter future wrongdoing. Only about 5% of mesothelioma lawsuits reach a jury verdict; most resolve through settlement negotiations. Actual compensation depends on factors including exposure history, disease type, treatment costs, and evidence of corporate knowledge or concealment of asbestos risks.