New Jersey Mesothelioma Verdicts and Settlements

Key New Jersey mesothelioma cases including Lanzo v. J&J, Barden v. J&J (reversed 2023), and Fowler v. Union Carbide ($2.38M, reinstated 2022).

New Jersey Mesothelioma Verdicts and Settlements
Key Facts
The April 2018 Lanzo v. Johnson and Johnson talc verdict of $117 million was reversed by the New Jersey Appellate Division on April 28, 2021 (Docket A-5711-17). No retrial or new judgment has been reported as of 2026-04-24.
The Barden consolidated talc verdict ($37.3 million compensatory in September 2019 plus $750 million punitive in February 2020, reduced at trial to $186.5 million) was REVERSED in full by the New Jersey Appellate Division on October 3, 2023, vacating both the compensatory and the reduced punitive awards (consolidated dockets A-0047-20 through A-0050-20).
The $2.38 million Fowler v. Union Carbide verdict (December 2018) is currently standing. The Appellate Division vacated it in May 2021, but the New Jersey Supreme Court reinstated the verdict on June 30, 2022 (Docket A-5-21).
New Jersey caps punitive damages at five times the compensatory award or $350,000, whichever is greater, under the New Jersey Punitive Damages Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.14.

New Jersey’s asbestos litigation runs through the state’s Multicounty Litigation program, with most filings assigned to Middlesex County Superior Court. Several of the largest reported talc and asbestos verdicts in the state have been disturbed on appeal, while a smaller verdict reached the New Jersey Supreme Court and was reinstated. The pattern that emerges from the published opinions is one of close appellate scrutiny of expert testimony and jury instructions in mesothelioma cases.

$117M
Lanzo v. J&J (2018, reversed Apr 28, 2021)
$750M
Barden punitive (2020, judgment reversed Oct 3, 2023)
$2.38M
Fowler v. Union Carbide (2018, reinstated by NJ Supreme Court 2022)
2 years
NJ statute of limitations (N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2)

For the broader context behind these cases, see New Jersey mesothelioma statistics.

Notable New Jersey Outcomes

New Jersey Mesothelioma Case Results
CaseYearAmountCurrent Status
Lanzo v. Johnson and Johnson / Imerys 2018 $117M Reversed Apr 28, 2021 (A-5711-17); no retrial reported
Barden v. Johnson and Johnson (consolidated) 2019-2020 $37.3M comp + $750M punitive (reduced to $186.5M at trial) Entire judgment reversed Oct 3, 2023 (A-0047-20 through A-0050-20)
Fowler v. Union Carbide 2018 $2.38M Reinstated by NJ Supreme Court Jun 30, 2022 (A-5-21)

Lanzo v. Johnson and Johnson

In April 2018, a Middlesex County jury awarded Stephen Lanzo III and his wife Kendra $117 million in a case alleging that asbestos-contaminated Johnson’s Baby Powder was a substantial factor in Lanzo’s mesothelioma. The award included $37 million in compensatory damages, with $7 million of that for loss of consortium, and $80 million in punitive damages. Punitive damages were split between the defendants, with $55 million assessed against Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. and $25 million against Imerys Talc America. Cyprus Amax Minerals and Johnson and Johnson (the parent entity) were dismissed before the verdict.

On April 28, 2021, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the Lanzo verdict in a published opinion (Docket A-5711-17) and remanded the matter for new, separate trials against Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America. The appellate panel held that the trial court failed its gatekeeping role under the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Accutane standard by admitting unreliable expert testimony linking non-asbestiform minerals to mesothelioma causation. The court also ruled that an adverse-inference instruction issued against Imerys for talc-sample spoliation prejudiced Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., requiring severance. As of 2026-04-24, no retrial, settlement, or new verdict has been reported.

For the broader talc litigation context, see our coverage of Johnson and Johnson talc lawsuits.

Barden v. Johnson and Johnson

In September 2019, a Middlesex County jury awarded $37.3 million in compensatory damages to four consolidated plaintiffs, Douglas Barden, David Etheridge, D’Angela McNeill-George, and William Ronning, in talc-asbestos cases against Johnson and Johnson and Brenntag North America (Docket Nos. MID-L-1809-17, MID-L-0932-17, and MID-L-7049-16). On February 9, 2020, the same jury added $750 million in punitive damages. The trial court applied the New Jersey Punitive Damages Act 5x cap and reduced the punitive award to $186.5 million.

On October 3, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the entire Barden judgment in the consolidated appeals docketed A-0047-20, A-0048-20, A-0049-20, and A-0050-20. The court vacated both the $37.3 million compensatory award and the $186.5 million reduced punitive award and remanded for a new trial. The panel held that the trial court erred in admitting unreliable expert testimony from plaintiff experts on asbestos causation and exposure, including methodologically disputed differential-diagnosis opinions and EPA-report extrapolations equating different fiber types. With liability reversed, the appellate court treated the punitive-phase challenges as moot. The Appellate Division later denied rehearing. As of 2026-04-24, no retrial, settlement, or New Jersey Supreme Court certification has been reported.

The 5x cap mechanic still operates as a matter of state statute. The trial-court reduction in Barden has no continuing legal effect because the underlying judgment was vacated.

Fowler v. Union Carbide

On December 4, 2018, a Middlesex County jury awarded $2.38 million in compensatory damages to Thomasenia L. Fowler, administrator of the estate of Willis Edenfield. Edenfield worked at the National Starch facility in Bloomfield, New Jersey from 1954 to 1994 and died of pleural mesothelioma in 2011. Trial evidence showed that Union Carbide shipped more than 40,000 pounds of Calidria asbestos to the facility over 12 years. After a two-month trial, the jury declined to award punitive damages.

The Fowler verdict followed an unusual appellate path. On May 26, 2021, the New Jersey Appellate Division (Docket A-4007-18) vacated the verdict and remanded for a new trial over jury-instruction issues. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the Appellate Division on June 30, 2022 (Docket A-5-21) and reinstated the $2.38 million verdict, holding that the trial court’s duty-to-warn and proximate-cause instructions, framed under the Sholtis medical-causation factors, were proper. The verdict is currently standing.

How Damages Are Awarded in New Jersey

Compensatory damages in New Jersey mesothelioma cases can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium for spouses. Punitive damages are limited by statute.

New Jersey Punitive Damages Framework
RuleApplication
Statutory cap 5x compensatory award or $350,000, whichever is greater (N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.14)
Standard of proof Clear and convincing evidence
Exceptions Cap does not apply to NJ Law Against Discrimination (LAD) or CEPA claims
Procedural note Juries are not informed of the cap; trial courts apply it post-verdict
Important Context

These figures are reported jury outcomes. The Lanzo verdict was reversed in 2021 and the Barden judgment was reversed in full in 2023; both remain in post-reversal posture as of 2026-04-24. The Fowler verdict is currently standing after the New Jersey Supreme Court reinstated it in 2022. Individual case results depend on specific facts, including exposure history, medical documentation, and the defendants involved. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filing Deadlines and Venue

New Jersey has a two-year statute of limitations for asbestos personal-injury claims, running from diagnosis or reasonable discovery under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2(a). Wrongful-death claims must be filed within two years of the date of death under N.J.S.A. 2A:31-3. The discovery rule is applied with awareness of the long latency of asbestos disease.

Approximately 92% of New Jersey asbestos matters are handled through the statewide Asbestos Multicounty Litigation program in Middlesex County Superior Court, Civil Division Part, in New Brunswick. Judge Ana C. Viscomi presides over the docket, with assistance from Special Master Agatha N. Dzikiewicz. More than 1,300 asbestos claims are pending in the consolidated litigation. The New Jersey Courts publish a statewide asbestos case list and trial list.

For comparison with neighboring states, see Pennsylvania mesothelioma verdicts and settlements and New York mesothelioma verdicts and settlements. For trust fund coverage that often runs alongside litigation, see New Jersey asbestos trust funds for workers. For the medical context behind these cases, see the 2026 mesothelioma treatment landscape.

What was the outcome of the Lanzo v. J&J verdict?

A Middlesex County jury awarded Stephen Lanzo III and his wife Kendra $117 million in April 2018. The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the verdict on April 28, 2021 (Docket A-5711-17), holding that the trial court failed its gatekeeping role under New Jersey’s Accutane standard for expert testimony and that an adverse-inference instruction against Imerys prejudiced Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. The case was remanded for new, separate trials. No retrial or new verdict has been reported as of 2026-04-24.

What is the current status of the Barden $750 million punitive verdict?

The Barden judgment has been reversed in full. A Middlesex County jury awarded $37.3 million in compensatory damages in September 2019 and added $750 million in punitive damages in February 2020. The trial court reduced the punitive award to $186.5 million under the New Jersey Punitive Damages Act 5x cap. On October 3, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the entire judgment in consolidated dockets A-0047-20 through A-0050-20, vacating both the compensatory and the reduced punitive awards and remanding for a new trial. The Appellate Division denied rehearing, and as of 2026-04-24 no retrial, settlement, or New Jersey Supreme Court certification has been reported.

What happened in Fowler v. Union Carbide on appeal?

The Appellate Division vacated the $2.38 million verdict on May 26, 2021 (A-4007-18), but the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed that decision on June 30, 2022 (A-5-21) and reinstated the verdict. The Supreme Court held that the trial court’s duty-to-warn and proximate-cause instructions, framed under the Sholtis factors, were proper. The verdict is currently standing.

What is the statute of limitations for mesothelioma in New Jersey?

New Jersey has a two-year statute of limitations for asbestos personal-injury claims, running from the date of diagnosis or reasonable discovery under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2(a). Wrongful-death claims must be filed within two years of the date of death under N.J.S.A. 2A:31-3.

Where are most New Jersey asbestos cases tried?

Most New Jersey asbestos filings are assigned to Middlesex County Superior Court, Civil Division Part, in New Brunswick, through the state’s Asbestos Multicounty Litigation program, which handles approximately 92% of the state’s asbestos caseload. Judge Ana C. Viscomi presides, with Special Master Agatha N. Dzikiewicz, and more than 1,300 claims are pending.

Can family members pursue a New Jersey mesothelioma case after a loved one dies?

New Jersey law recognizes wrongful-death claims under N.J.S.A. 2A:31-3, with a two-year filing deadline running from the date of death. Estate representatives and qualifying family members can bring these claims in addition to any survival actions.

References

New Jersey Courts. New Jersey Courts Asbestos Multicounty Litigation Case Information.
https://www.njcourts.gov/multicounty-litigation/asbestos/case-information

Justia. Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals (NJ Appellate Division, A-5711-17).
https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-published/2021/a5711-17.html

New Jersey Courts. Stephan Lanzo III, et al. v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, et al. (L-7385-16, Middlesex).
https://www.njcourts.gov/court-opinion/stephan-lanzo-iii-et-al-vs-cyprus-amax-minerals-company-et-al-l-7385-16-middlesex

New Jersey Courts. Barden et al. consolidated appellate opinion (A-0047-20 through A-0050-20, Oct 3, 2023).
https://www.njcourts.gov/system/files/court-opinions/2023/a0047-20a0048-20a0049-20a0050-20.pdf

Mealey's. New Jersey Appeals Court Won't Reconsider Asbestos-Talc Expert Admission Ruling.
https://www.mealeys.com/mealeys/articles/1738109/new-jersey-appeals-court-won-t-reconsider-asbestos-talc-expert-admission-ruling

New Jersey Courts. Fowler v. Union Carbide (NJ Supreme Court, A-5-21, June 30, 2022).
https://www.njcourts.gov/system/files/court-opinions/2022/a_5_21.pdf

Courtroom View Network. NJ Jury Hits Union Carbide With $2.38M Asbestos Verdict.
https://blog.cvn.com/nj-jury-hits-union-carbide-with-2.38m-asbestos-verdict-punitive-damages-phase-to-follow

Insurance Journal. J&J Hit With $750M Punitive Damages in Talc Asbestos Cases.
https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/08/07/578191.htm

Sills Cummis & Gross. Pritchett v. State of New Jersey, 248 N.J. 85 (Punitive Damages Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.14).
https://www.sillscummis.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Pritchett-v.-N.J._-248-N.J.-85.pdf

Garden State CLE. New Jersey Statutes of Limitations.
https://gardenstatecle.com/pdf/SOL.pdf