Legal Updated 5 min read

$3.3M Ford Asbestos Brake Verdict Upheld in NY

A New York appeals court upheld a $3.3M verdict against Ford after a former dealership worker was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma from brake dust.

$3.3M Ford Asbestos Brake Verdict Upheld in NY
Key Facts
New York appeals court upheld a $3.3 million jury verdict against Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff Joseph Skrzynski worked in a Ford dealership parts department from 1975 to 1980
He was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in 2021
Ford brake components contained 25% to 50% chrysotile asbestos
The jury found Ford negligent in failing to warn workers about asbestos risks

The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has upheld a $3.3 million verdict against Ford Motor Company in an asbestos lawsuit brought by a former dealership parts department worker diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma decades after his exposure to Ford’s brake products.

Background

Joseph Skrzynski worked in the parts department of a Lincoln-Ford-Mercury dealership in Orchard Park, New York, from 1975 to 1980, where he regularly handled brake components and stood near more than 1,000 brake jobs involving blowouts, sanding, and cleanup. In 2021, he was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer of the abdominal lining linked to asbestos exposure.

Court records show that Ford’s brake components contained between 25% and 50% chrysotile asbestos. Testing by an environmental scientist established that handling those brakes released toxic dust into the air, creating an inhalation hazard for workers like Skrzynski.

Jury Findings

The jury determined that Ford’s brake products were a “significant contributing factor” in Skrzynski’s peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosis. Jurors also found that Ford was negligent in failing to warn dealership workers about the risks of asbestos in its brake components, and returned a verdict of $3.3 million in damages.

Peritoneal mesothelioma affects the lining of the abdomen. It is distinct from pleural mesothelioma, which affects the lining of the lungs, though both forms are associated with asbestos exposure.

Appeal Rejected

Ford challenged the verdict on appeal, but the appellate court rejected the company’s arguments and affirmed the jury’s findings. The ruling leaves the $3.3 million award intact.

The case adds to a long history of asbestos litigation against Ford and other automakers whose brake, clutch, and gasket products contained asbestos through much of the twentieth century. Parts department employees and mechanics who handled those components regularly were among those with documented exposure.

References

Automotive News. (2025-08-22). Asbestos verdict against Ford upheld by appeals court.
https://www.autonews.com/retail/service-and-parts/an-parts-worker-asbestos-court-ruling-0822/

Asbestos & Mesothelioma Law Blog. (2025-09-29). Appeals Court Upholds $3.3 Million Mesothelioma Verdict Against Ford Motor Company.
https://www.mesolawcenter.com/blog/appeals-court-upholds-3-3-million-mesothelioma-verdict-against-ford-motor-company/

Reader Q&A

Frequently Asked Questions

What is peritoneal mesothelioma?

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a cancer of the peritoneum, the thin tissue lining the abdomen. It is caused by asbestos fibers that are ingested or inhaled and migrate to the abdominal cavity. It is rarer than pleural mesothelioma but shares the same connection to asbestos exposure.

What type of asbestos was in Ford's brake components?

Court records in this case show that Ford’s brake products contained chrysotile asbestos, also known as white asbestos, at concentrations ranging from 25% to 50%.

How long after exposure was the plaintiff diagnosed?

Joseph Skrzynski worked at a Ford dealership parts department from 1975 to 1980. His mesothelioma diagnosis came in 2021, reflecting the disease’s characteristic latency period of several decades.

What did the appeals court decide?

The New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, upheld the jury’s $3.3 million verdict in July 2025, rejecting Ford’s arguments for reversal and affirming the findings that Ford was negligent and that its brake products were a significant contributing factor to the plaintiff’s illness.

When did they stop putting asbestos in car brakes?

Most U.S. auto manufacturers stopped using asbestos in brake pads during the 1980s and 1990s. However, asbestos was not formally banned in brake pads until the EPA finalized a prohibition in March 2024. Older vehicles manufactured before the 1990s may still contain asbestos-containing brake components, and aftermarket brake parts with asbestos remained legal to sell in the U.S. until the 2024 ban. Internationally, asbestos is still used in brake pads and related automotive materials in some countries.

How do I know if my brake pads have asbestos?

You cannot visually identify whether brake pads contain asbestos by looking at them. For newer vehicles, check the packaging, labels, or Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) from the manufacturer or auto parts retailer. For older vehicles or those with replaced brakes, this information may not be readily available. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommends that mechanics assume all brakes contain asbestos and use proper dust control procedures, since worn asbestos and non-asbestos brake types cannot be distinguished by appearance. If you suspect asbestos exposure from brake work, consult a healthcare provider about screening options.

Does Ford use asbestos?

Ford Motor Company used asbestos in automotive parts such as brake linings, brake pads, clutches, gaskets, engine components, and hood liners from 1903 until phasing it out in the early 1980s, with some replacement parts available until at least 2001. Mechanics, factory workers, and consumers faced exposure risks from these friction products, which contained 40-60% chrysotile asbestos by weight and released fibers during grinding or sanding. Ford does not currently use asbestos in its vehicles or parts. People with mesothelioma linked to Ford products have pursued claims, with one jury awarding $34 million against the company.

Will 30 minutes of asbestos exposure hurt you?

No level of asbestos exposure is safe, but 30 minutes of exposure carries a low risk of causing mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases, as risk follows a dose-response relationship tied more to long-term occupational exposure. OSHA notes short exposures as brief as a few days can cause mesothelioma, yet evidence shows one-time or brief incidents like 30 minutes are unlikely to harm unless involving high fiber concentrations, poor ventilation, or amphibole asbestos types. Factors such as visible dust or enclosed spaces elevate potential harm, while intact materials outdoors pose minimal threat. People with any exposure history report details to physicians, as diseases may appear 20-50 years later.