Asbestos Pipe Maker Sues Plaintiff Law Firm
J-M Manufacturing filed a RICO lawsuit against the Gori law firm. Similar tactics by Garlock in 2014 were dropped. Here's what claimants should know.
J-M Manufacturing, a Los Angeles-based plastic pipe company, filed a federal RICO lawsuit against the Gori law firm on January 28, 2026. The lawsuit accuses the plaintiff firm of fraud in asbestos litigation. This follows a pattern of asbestos defendants suing plaintiff attorneys, a tactic that has historically been used to discourage legitimate claims.
This is a legal dispute between corporations and law firms. It should not discourage people with legitimate mesothelioma diagnoses from seeking legal help. Juries continue to award billions to people affected by asbestos when cases go to trial.
The Background on J-M Manufacturing
J-M Manufacturing acquired pipe manufacturing operations from Johns-Manville Corporation in 1982, after Johns-Manville filed for bankruptcy due to asbestos liabilities. The company supplied asbestos-cement pipe from 1983 to 1988.
Key facts about J-M:
- Has faced over 6,000 asbestos lawsuits since 2000
- Lost a $22.2 million verdict in Morgan v. J-M Manufacturing (2018)
- Previously sued its own defense lawyers for being “too willing to settle”
- Has filed similar lawsuits against Simmons Hanly Conroy and Sokolove Law
The Allegations
J-M’s lawsuit alleges:
- Attorneys filed claims without adequate investigation
- Pre-drafted affidavits were used
- Cases were filed to create settlement leverage
The Gori firm responded by calling the claims “ridiculous” and characterizing the lawsuit as “scare tactics” by “an asbestos company.”
Historical Context: The Garlock Playbook
This is not the first time asbestos defendants have used RICO lawsuits against plaintiff firms. In 2014, Garlock Sealing Technologies filed similar RICO claims against four plaintiff law firms.
| Year | What Happened |
|---|---|
| 2014 | Garlock files RICO lawsuits against four plaintiff firms |
| 2015 | Plaintiff firms file counterclaims |
| 2016 | Garlock drops all RICO claims as part of settlement |
The Garlock case settled for $480 million (compared to the $1.26 billion plaintiffs originally sought), and all RICO claims were abandoned.
What Defense Advocates Argue
Defense-side organizations have long pushed for “asbestos trust transparency” legislation, arguing that some plaintiff firms file inconsistent claims with different defendants and bankruptcy trusts.
What Plaintiff Advocates Counter
Plaintiff attorneys argue these transparency proposals are designed to delay litigation and deter legitimate claims. They note:
- High dismissal rates are normal in asbestos cases, which typically name many defendants and narrow during discovery
- Defense data shows cases average 38 defendants initially, with half dismissed as exposure histories clarify
- This reflects normal legal procedure, not fraud
The Real Story: Juries Still Hold Companies Accountable
While defendants pursue these legal strategies, juries continue to find for plaintiffs in asbestos cases:
| Date | Verdict | Defendant |
|---|---|---|
| December 2025 | $1.56 billion | Johnson & Johnson |
| October 2025 | $966 million | Johnson & Johnson |
| 2025 | $33 million | John Crane |
| 2025 | $18 million | Various (brake dust case) |
Average mesothelioma settlements remain between $1 million and $1.4 million. Over $30 billion remains in asbestos trust funds for people affected by asbestos exposure.
What People With Mesothelioma Should Know
-
These allegations are unproven. They are claims in a lawsuit, not established facts.
-
The company has its own incentives. J-M bought asbestos pipe operations knowing the liability history and has lost major verdicts at trial.
-
Legal options remain. The vast majority of mesothelioma cases involve genuine exposure histories and result in compensation for people with real exposure to asbestos.
-
Consult qualified attorneys. People diagnosed with mesothelioma should discuss their options with experienced asbestos litigation attorneys, regardless of this corporate legal dispute.
References
ABA Journal. Gori firm accused of fraud and racketeering in asbestos litigation.
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/gori-firm-accused-of-fraud-and-racketeering-in-asbestos-litigation
Legal Newsline. JM Eagle files RICO lawsuit against Gori Law Firm.
https://www.legalnewsline.com/pennsylvania-record/madison-stclair-record/gori-law-firm-faces-fraud-and-racketeering-accusations/article_848d5ea2-85d4-4ab8-898f-f07054b3cce2.html
Reuters. PVC giant JM Eagle revives racketeering case against asbestos law firm.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/pvc-giant-jm-eagle-revives-racketeering-case-against-asbestos-law-firm-2025-11-12/
Reader Q&A
Frequently Asked Questions
Is J-M Manufacturing an asbestos defendant?
Yes. J-M is a liable party in asbestos litigation. The company acquired asbestos pipe operations from Johns-Manville in 1982, knowing the liabilities. Courts and juries have found J-M responsible for asbestos injuries.
Has J-M been found liable at trial?
Yes. J-M lost a $22.2 million verdict in Morgan v. J-M Manufacturing in 2018. The company has faced over 6,000 asbestos lawsuits since 2000.
Why is a liable defendant suing plaintiff law firms?
J-M has filed RICO lawsuits against multiple firms and even sued its own defense lawyers for being “too willing to settle.” This pattern of suing everyone involved in litigation against the company raises questions about the company’s strategy.
Did Garlock's RICO lawsuits against plaintiff firms succeed?
No. Garlock Sealing Technologies filed RICO claims against four plaintiff firms in 2014 but dropped all claims in 2016. The tactic failed.
What is Rico and why is it so bad?
RICO stands for the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a federal law passed in 1970 that allows prosecutors to charge individuals or groups with racketeering when they commit at least two predicate crimes (such as fraud, extortion, or money laundering) within a 10-year period as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. RICO is considered severe because convictions carry penalties of up to 20 years in prison, fines up to $250,000 or double the proceeds from illegal activity, and asset forfeiture that can occur before trial. The law is also broad in scope, allowing prosecutors to target not just organized crime but any pattern of criminal conduct connected to an enterprise, which has expanded its application beyond its original purpose. Additionally, the threat of RICO charges can pressure defendants to accept plea deals because asset seizure makes it difficult to pay for legal defense.
What is the average payout for an asbestos claim?
Average payouts for asbestos claims vary by disease type and resolution method. People with mesothelioma typically receive $1 million to $2.4 million in lawsuit settlements from multiple defendants, plus $300,000 to $400,000 from trust funds. Asbestos-related lung cancer claims average $250,000 overall, while non-malignant conditions like asbestosis yield $10,000 to $50,000. Trial verdicts for mesothelioma average $5 million to $11.4 million but are less common than settlements. These figures reflect reported trends from law firm data as of 2026.
What does a Rico lawsuit mean?
A RICO lawsuit refers to a civil claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968), a 1970 federal law that allows people injured in their business or property by racketeering activity to sue for treble damages and attorney fees. To succeed, plaintiffs must prove defendants conducted an “enterprise” through a “pattern of racketeering activity,” typically at least two related predicate acts (like mail fraud or bribery) within 10 years. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that such claims can cover business or property losses deriving from personal injuries, as in lost wages from a misrepresented product. Civil RICO suits differ from criminal cases by focusing on compensation rather than punishment.
Was asbestos used in Puerto Rico?
Yes, asbestos was widely used in Puerto Rico from the 1940s through the 1980s in thousands of building materials and products similar to those used on the U.S. mainland. Hundreds of public schools and public housing complexes built during the 1940s to 1970s contained asbestos-containing materials. Workers across multiple industries, including those at manufacturing facilities like the Union Carbide plant in Ponce, were exposed to asbestos. Many older structures in Puerto Rico, including houses, schools, and office buildings, still contain asbestos today. Natural disasters like hurricanes have raised additional concerns about asbestos release from damaged buildings and potential contamination of water supplies.